Ciao a tutti, ho ripreso per approfondire una cosa SpatialLite Cookbook e sto usando l'ultima versione di spatialite_gui.SQL error: no such function: RTreeIntersects SELECT lc1.lc_name AS "Tuscan Local Council", c1.county_name AS "Tuscan County", lc2.lc_name AS "Neighbour LC", c2.county_name AS County, r2.region_name AS Region FROM local_councils AS lc1, local_councils AS lc2 JOIN counties AS c1 ON (c1.county_id = lc1.county_id) JOIN counties AS c2 ON (c2.county_id = lc2.county_id) JOIN regions AS r1 ON (r1.region_id = c1.region_id) JOIN regions AS r2 ON (r2.region_id = c2.region_id) WHERE r1.region_name LIKE 'toscana' AND r1.region_id <> r2.region_id AND ST_Touches(lc1.geometry, lc2.geometry) AND lc2.ROWID IN ( SELECT pkid FROM idx_local_councils_geometry WHERE pkid MATCH RTreeIntersects( MbrMinX(lc1.geometry), MbrMinY(lc1.geometry), MbrMaxX(lc1.geometry), MbrMaxY(lc1.geometry))) ORDER BY c1.county_name, lc1.lc_name; come posso modificarla per ottenere lo stesso risultato? Grazie mille anticipatamente Cesare _______________________________________________ [hidden email] http://lists.gfoss.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gfoss Questa e' una lista di discussione pubblica aperta a tutti. I messaggi di questa lista non hanno relazione diretta con le posizioni dell'Associazione GFOSS.it. 666 iscritti al 22.7.2013 |
Premesso che la query in questione sembra scritta per far casino :) Infatti usa due volte la medesima tabella local_councils e quindi un utente che deve imparare non capisce se nell'indice deve fare riferimento alla prima o alla seconda tabella (sono entrambe le stesse!).SELECT lc1.lc_name AS "Tuscan Local Council", c1.county_name AS "Tuscan County", lc2.lc_name AS "Neighbour LC", c2.county_name AS County, r2.region_name AS Region FROM local_councils AS lc1, local_councils AS lc2 JOIN counties AS c1 ON (c1.county_id = lc1.county_id) JOIN counties AS c2 ON (c2.county_id = lc2.county_id) JOIN regions AS r1 ON (r1.region_id = c1.region_id) JOIN regions AS r2 ON (r2.region_id = c2.region_id) WHERE r1.region_name LIKE 'toscana' AND r1.region_id <> r2.region_id AND ST_Touches(lc1.geometry, lc2.geometry) AND lc2.ROWID IN ( SELECT pkid FROM idx_local_councils_geometry WHERE pkid MATCH RTreeIntersects( MbrMinX(lc1.geometry), MbrMinY(lc1.geometry), MbrMaxX(lc1.geometry), MbrMaxY(lc1.geometry) ) ) ORDER BY c1.county_name, lc1.lc_name; Ovviamente si parla di un db generato con la medesima ultima versione di SL. SELECT lc1.lc_name AS "Tuscan Local Council", c1.county_name AS "Tuscan County", lc2.lc_name AS "Neighbour LC", c2.county_name AS County, r2.region_name AS Region FROM local_councils AS lc1, local_councils AS lc2 JOIN counties AS c1 ON (c1.county_id = lc1.county_id) JOIN counties AS c2 ON (c2.county_id = lc2.county_id) JOIN regions AS r1 ON (r1.region_id = c1.region_id) JOIN regions AS r2 ON (r2.region_id = c2.region_id) WHERE r1.region_name LIKE 'toscana' AND r1.region_id <> r2.region_id AND ST_Touches(lc1.geometry, lc2.geometry) AND lc2.ROWID IN ( SELECT ROWID FROM SpatialIndex WHERE f_table_name='MAIN=local_councils' AND search_frame=lc1.geometry ) ) ORDER BY c1.county_name, lc1.lc_name; WHERE f_table_name='DB=allegato.local_councils' AND search_frame=lc1.geometry Saluti,
Il giorno 05 gennaio 2014 11:08, cesare gerbino <[hidden email]> ha scritto:
-- ----------------- Andrea Peri . . . . . . . . . qwerty àèìòù ----------------- _______________________________________________ [hidden email] http://lists.gfoss.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gfoss Questa e' una lista di discussione pubblica aperta a tutti. I messaggi di questa lista non hanno relazione diretta con le posizioni dell'Associazione GFOSS.it. 666 iscritti al 22.7.2013 |
Ciao Andrea, Ora non dà più errore anche se al momento mi restituisce un insieme vuoto ..... riproverò.grazie della risposta sollecita: nella tua select c'era un errore, una parentesi tonda in più, la versione sintatticamente corretta è questa SELECT lc1.lc_name AS "Tuscan Local Council", c1.county_name AS "Tuscan County", lc2.lc_name AS "Neighbour LC", c2.county_name AS County, r2.region_name AS Region FROM local_councils AS lc1, local_councils AS lc2 JOIN counties AS c1 ON (c1.county_id = lc1.county_id) JOIN counties AS c2 ON (c2.county_id = lc2.county_id) JOIN regions AS r1 ON (r1.region_id = c1.region_id) JOIN regions AS r2 ON (r2.region_id = c2.region_id) WHERE r1.region_name LIKE 'toscana' AND r1.region_id <> r2.region_id AND ST_Touches(lc1.geometry, lc2.geometry) AND lc2.ROWID IN ( SELECT ROWID FROM SpatialIndex WHERE f_table_name='MAIN=local_councils' AND search_frame=lc1.geometry ) ORDER BY c1.county_name, lc1.lc_name; Cesare Gerbino
http://cesaregerbino.wordpress.com/ http://www.facebook.com/cesare.gerbino http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cesare-Gerbino-GIS-Blog/246234455498174?ref=hl https://twitter.com/CesareGerbino http://www.linkedin.com/pub/cesare-gerbino/56/494/77b Il giorno 05 gennaio 2014 11:24, Andrea Peri <[hidden email]> ha scritto:
_______________________________________________ [hidden email] http://lists.gfoss.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gfoss Questa e' una lista di discussione pubblica aperta a tutti. I messaggi di questa lista non hanno relazione diretta con le posizioni dell'Associazione GFOSS.it. 666 iscritti al 22.7.2013 |
La sintassi giusta e':
SELECT lc1.lc_name AS "Tuscan Local Council", c1.county_name AS "Tuscan County", lc2.lc_name AS "Neighbour LC", c2.county_name AS County, r2.region_name AS Region FROM local_councils AS lc1, local_councils AS lc2 JOIN counties AS c1 ON (c1.county_id = lc1.county_id) JOIN counties AS c2 ON (c2.county_id = lc2.county_id) JOIN regions AS r1 ON (r1.region_id = c1.region_id) JOIN regions AS r2 ON (r2.region_id = c2.region_id) WHERE r1.region_name LIKE 'toscana' AND r1.region_id <> r2.region_id AND ST_Touches(lc1.geometry, lc2.geometry) AND lc2.ROWID IN ( SELECT ROWID FROM SpatialIndex WHERE f_table_name='DB=main.local_councils' AND search_frame=lc1.geometry ) ORDER BY c1.county_name, lc1.lc_name; N.B: ... WHERE f_table_name='DB=main.local_councils' ... e' la sintassi estesa che supporta anche il caso in cui siano eventualmente presenti degli ATTACHed DB; ma nel nostro caso e' connesso un unico DB (il primario) e quindi bastava usare piu' semplicemente la notazione base (senza indicare il prefisso/alias del DB): ... WHERE f_table_name='local_councils' ... --------------- comunque se ne scopre sempre una nuova :-D a partire dalla version 3.8.0 SQLite ha adottato un "next generation query planner" che "quasi sempre" e' in grado di eseguire le queries in modo significativamente piu' veloce. purtroppo in qualche caso "sfortunato" invece il nuovo planner puo' anche rallentare catastroficamente la velocita' di esecuzione. (fatto ben noto ed abbondantemente documentato nelle note di rilascio delle ultime versioni di SQLite) purtroppo nel caso particolare di questa query specifica abbiamo proprio un esempio di come il nuovo query planner possa avere un impatto assolutamente nefasto. infatti questa query (decisamente complessa) con il nuovo planner finisce per selezionare come guida l'indice suggerito dalla clausola ORDER BY: ma cosi' lo spatial index finisce "messo in ombra", e si ha un rallentamento catastrofico. se si riscrive la query semplicemente omettendo del tutto la ORDER BY si scopre invece che la query torna a funzionare a tutta manetta (proprio come avveniva con le vecchie versioni di sqlite). tempi oggettivi misurati: con ORDER BY: circa 3 minuti senza ORDER BY: poco meno di 10 secondi :-D ciao Sandro _______________________________________________ [hidden email] http://lists.gfoss.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gfoss Questa e' una lista di discussione pubblica aperta a tutti. I messaggi di questa lista non hanno relazione diretta con le posizioni dell'Associazione GFOSS.it. 666 iscritti al 22.7.2013 |
Alessandro,
grazie per la correzione. L'errore causava una errata dichiarazione di tabelle che in spatialite equivale a d avere sempre risultato vuoto. se si riscrive la query semplicemente omettendo del tutto la > ORDER BY si scopre invece che la query torna a funzionare a tutta > manetta (proprio come avveniva con le vecchie versioni di sqlite). > tempi oggettivi misurati: > > con ORDER BY: circa 3 minuti > senza ORDER BY: poco meno di 10 secondi :-D organizzandola con una subquery che esegua il lavoro spaziale e una query che esegue solamente l'ordinamento, il query planner non dovrebbe far eseguire l'ordinamento prima del filtraggio con l'indice spaziale. select z."Tuscan Local Council", z."Tuscan County", z."Neighbour LC", z.County, z.Region, z.geometry from ( SELECT lc1.lc_name AS "Tuscan Local Council", c1.county_name AS "Tuscan County", lc2.lc_name AS "Neighbour LC", c2.county_name AS County, r2.region_name AS Region FROM local_councils AS lc1, local_councils AS lc2 JOIN counties AS c1 ON (c1.county_id = lc1.county_id) JOIN counties AS c2 ON (c2.county_id = lc2.county_id) JOIN regions AS r1 ON (r1.region_id = c1.region_id) JOIN regions AS r2 ON (r2.region_id = c2.region_id) WHERE r1.region_name LIKE 'toscana' AND r1.region_id <> r2.region_id AND ST_Touches(lc1.geometry, lc2.geometry) AND lc2.ROWID IN ( SELECT ROWID FROM SpatialIndex WHERE f_table_name='DB=main.local_councils' AND search_frame=lc1.geometry ) ) as z ORDER BY z.county_name, z.lc_name; Andrea. _______________________________________________ [hidden email] http://lists.gfoss.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gfoss Questa e' una lista di discussione pubblica aperta a tutti. I messaggi di questa lista non hanno relazione diretta con le posizioni dell'Associazione GFOSS.it. 666 iscritti al 22.7.2013 |
Ciao Sandro e Andrea, allora ho provato e direi che ora la situazione è questa.SELECT lc1.lc_name AS "Tuscan Local Council", c1.county_name AS "Tuscan County", lc2.lc_name AS "Neighbour LC", c2.county_name AS County, r2.region_name AS Region FROM local_councils AS lc1, local_councils AS lc2 JOIN counties AS c1 ON (c1.county_id = lc1.county_id) JOIN counties AS c2 ON (c2.county_id = lc2.county_id) JOIN regions AS r1 ON (r1.region_id = c1.region_id) JOIN regions AS r2 ON (r2.region_id = c2.region_id) WHERE r1.region_name LIKE 'toscana' AND r1.region_id <> r2.region_id AND ST_Touches(lc1.geometry, lc2.geometry) AND lc2.ROWID IN ( SELECT ROWID FROM SpatialIndex WHERE f_table_name='DB=main.local_councils' AND search_frame=lc1.geometry
) ORDER BY c1.county_name, lc1.lc_name; La select di Andrea aveva qualche piccolo errore che mi sembra ora di aver corretto e quindi la versione definitiva è la seguente: select z."Tuscan Local Council", z."Tuscan County", z."Neighbour LC", z.County, z.Region, z.geometry from ( SELECT lc1.lc_name AS "Tuscan Local Council", c1.county_name AS "Tuscan County", lc2.lc_name AS "Neighbour LC", c2.county_name AS County, r2.region_name AS Region, lc1.geometry AS geometry FROM local_councils AS lc1, local_councils AS lc2 JOIN counties AS c1 ON (c1.county_id = lc1.county_id) JOIN counties AS c2 ON (c2.county_id = lc2.county_id) JOIN regions AS r1 ON (r1.region_id = c1.region_id) JOIN regions AS r2 ON (r2.region_id = c2.region_id) WHERE r1.region_name LIKE 'toscana' AND r1.region_id <> r2.region_id AND ST_Touches(lc1.geometry, lc2.geometry) AND lc2.ROWID IN ( SELECT ROWID FROM SpatialIndex WHERE f_table_name='DB=main.local_councils' AND search_frame=lc1.geometry ) ) as z ORDER BY z."Tuscan County", z."Neighbour LC"; Grazie mille per il sollecito supporto Cesare Cesare Gerbino
http://cesaregerbino.wordpress.com/ http://www.facebook.com/cesare.gerbino http://www.facebook.com/pages/Cesare-Gerbino-GIS-Blog/246234455498174?ref=hl https://twitter.com/CesareGerbino http://www.linkedin.com/pub/cesare-gerbino/56/494/77b Il giorno 05 gennaio 2014 13:15, aperi2007 <[hidden email]> ha scritto: Alessandro, _______________________________________________ [hidden email] http://lists.gfoss.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gfoss Questa e' una lista di discussione pubblica aperta a tutti. I messaggi di questa lista non hanno relazione diretta con le posizioni dell'Associazione GFOSS.it. 666 iscritti al 22.7.2013 |
http://gfoss-geographic-free-and-open-source-software-italian-mailing.3056002.n2.nabble.com/SpatiaLite-Cookbook-SQL-error-no-such-function-RTreeIntersects-td7585692.html
============================ Riesumo questa vecchia discussione, per riportare la corretta sintassi per l'estrazione dei soli comuni isolani (pag. 103 dell'obsoleto PDF di A.Furieri): SELECT lc1.lc_name AS "Comune Istat", c.county_name AS Provincia, r.region_name AS Regione, ST_Area(lc1.geometry)/1000000 as Area_KMQ FROM local_councils AS lc1 JOIN counties AS c ON ( c.county_id = lc1.county_id) JOIN regions AS r ON ( r.region_id = c.region_id) LEFT JOIN local_councils AS lc2 ON ( lc1.lc_id <> lc2.lc_id AND NOT ST_Disjoint(lc1.geometry, lc2.geometry) AND lc2.ROWID IN ( SELECT ROWID FROM SpatialIndex WHERE f_table_name='DB=main.local_councils' AND search_frame=lc1.geometry )) group by lc1.lc_id having count(lc2.lc_id)=0 order by lc1.lc_name |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |